Westminster Legal Policy Forum

This conference examined next steps for immigration policy in the UK.

It was an opportunity for stakeholders and policymakers to assess proposals in the Government’s recently published Immigration White Paper, aiming to reduce international recruitment, including:

• raising the Skilled Worker threshold
• ending social care visas
• altering the requirements for universities to recruit international students and reducing the length of time graduates can remain in the UK after completing their studies
• amendments to family life criteria
• introduction of new English language requirements and increasing the qualifying period for settlement to 10 years

We expected the agenda to bring out latest thinking on next steps for the points-based system, the impact of proposals in the White Paper, key considerations for employers, workforce planning and the higher education sector, as well as border security.

The conference also took place in the context of government commitments of £280m additional RDEL per year by 2028-29 to tackle people smuggling gangs, alongside £200m announced in the 2025 Spending Review which aims to improve the asylum system.

Sessions drew on the White Paper’s proposals to support the domestic workforce and reduce international recruitment, with discussion on current immigration trends, priorities for the Migration Advisory Committee and Skills England in developing guidance on a joined-up approach to reducing net migration. There was also a focus on the role of the newly established Labour Market Evidence Group to scrutinise overseas recruitment and support domestic skills investment.

Delegates considered strategic approaches to improving training for UK citizens as a way to reduce net migration, with the MAC finding in its 2024 annual report that home-grown workers are not always direct substitutes.

Approaches for coordination of joint working were discussed, including between the MAC, government departments and bodies such as Skills England, Industrial Strategy Council, and as well as law enforcement agencies with proposed streamlined approaches to deportations. The overall impact of reducing net migration on the wider UK economy and economic growth was also considered.

We also expected discussion on the impact of changes to immigration rules and how skills shortages in key sectors can be addressed in light of restrictions to visa routes, including health and social care, IT, construction and engineering. There was discussion on strategies for strengthening eligibility to work checks, with new laws introduced requiring employers hiring gig economy workers to expand their illegal working checks, with further proposals announced to fully digitise the immigration system to support the change to eVisas and new biometric technologies.

Those attending also focused on the impact of immigration reform on higher education financial sustainability, looking at the attractiveness of the UK as a destination for international students, with discussion on challenges for graduate recruitment and university funding, and the way forward for addressing dependence on international student fees in light of new proposals in the White Paper to alter the requirements for universities to recruit international students and the reduction of the length of time that international students can remain in the UK after completing their studies to 18 months.

Further sessions examined wider policy proposals, including the recent introduction of the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill, which proposes new criminal offences aimed at tackling immigration-related crime and gangs, and strengthening border security. Those attending assessed implications of proposals in the Bill on immigrants and the wider asylum system. Delegates considered priorities and practicalities for addressing immigration-related crime, with concerns from some that measures in the Bill could lead to an increase in the number of refugees being prosecuted, as well as the impact of funding for appeal cases and potentially ‘return hubs’.

Overall, areas for discussion included:

• policy: White Paper proposals and next steps for immigration reform - potential changes to the points-based system - priorities for the MAC, Skills England, and the ISC
• eVisas: transitioning to a fully digital immigration system - impact on migrants, employers, and public services - access and usability - addressing potential barriers for the digitally disadvantaged and data privacy concerns
• economic factors: implications of rising visa and naturalisation fees - visa category changes and impact on sector workforce planning - considerations for businesses and education adaptation
• workforce planning: coordinating immigration policy with domestic skills strategies - priorities for Skills England and other bodies in upskilling and reducing reliance on migrant labour
• labour market: addressing implications for sectors such as health and social care, hospitality, and IT - domestic workforce development priorities - planning for reduced reliance on migrant labour - impact of abolishing the Immigration Salary List
• higher education: UK attractiveness as a destination for international students - challenges for student recruitment and university funding - addressing dependence on international student fees
• border security: priorities for managing borders and controlling migration - effectiveness of enforcement policies - balancing security with human rights considerations
• modern slavery: impact of reforms on protections against modern slavery - latest thinking on tackling exploitation in high-risk sectors - safeguarding vulnerable migrants and asylum seekers
• integration: impact of immigration policies on community cohesion and access to healthcare, housing, and education - addressing barriers to support - ensuring effective welfare provision
• alternative approaches for policy: considering non-UK approaches - assessing potential options for greater flexibility and responsiveness in the immigration framework

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices, and more widely. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those who attended include parliamentary pass-holders from the House of Lords and officials from the Home Office; MAC; FCDO; MHCLG; DHSC; DBT; DSIT; DfE; DAERA, NI; Department for the Economy, NI; NAO; CQC; DCEDIY, ROI; the Welsh Government; and The Scottish Government.

This conference assessed next steps for the evolving use of artificial intelligence in the UK legal sector, focusing on regulatory priorities, ethical and practical considerations, and implications for legal service delivery, professional practice, and public interest outcomes.

Regulatory frameworks and sector guidance
It brought key stakeholders and policymakers together to discuss the Government’s ongoing framework for AI, including A pro-innovation approach to AI regulation and the recently published AI Opportunities Action Plan backed by £2.bn funding announced in the 2025 Spending Review. Delegates assessed priorities for enabling innovation in legal practice while addressing concerns around transparency and accountability, looking at AI-related guidance from the Legal Services Board, the Solicitors Regulation Authority, and the Information Commissioner’s Office.

Responsibility in AI adoption and managing risk
We expected discussion on immediate issues facing law firms and regulators, including around data protection, cyber resilience, and professional responsibility in the context of deploying generative AI tools. Sessions assessed options for mitigating risks, such as bias, inaccuracy, and IP infringement, alongside best practice in how AI systems can be used to support tasks of varying complexity, from document handling and legal research, to case preparation.

Adoption challenges and practical support for smaller providers
Attendees considered the role of AI in alternative dispute resolution, particularly its use in document review, case management and predictive analysis. Issues for smaller practices and in-house teams were also discussed, including support that might be needed in adopting AI responsibly, and in putting in place the infrastructure and training required to enable effective and ethical use across the profession.

Innovation, standards and sector-specific regulation
The agenda also looked at wider strategic issues, including development of best practice standards, how the Government’s approach to sector-specific regulation applies to the legal profession, and putting in place robust safeguards to protect against any potential negative impact of AI-powered processes on access to justice, client care, and competition in legal markets.

As AI rapidly evolves, further areas for discussion included the future direction of regulatory guidance, how domestic frameworks might evolve to keep pace with technological change, ensuring consistency across professional bodies, and supporting innovation without compromising ethical or legal standards.

International coordination and implications for UK practice
Further sessions examined international developments in AI governance and legal technology, looking at implications for the UK, regulatory alignment, and cross-border practice, including recent guidance from global arbitration institutions.

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices, and more widely. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those who attended include officials from the Cabinet Office; DSIT; DfT; MOJ; GLD; NCA; Dstl; CMA; UKHSA; Ofcom; Home Office; and The Scottish Government.

This conference examined next steps for child protection and safeguarding practice in England, particularly in light of recent policy initiatives aimed at tackling child sexual exploitation. It took place following the announcement of a new statutory national inquiry into child grooming gangs, and with publication of the National Audit on Group-Based Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse, alongside the Government’s formal response.

Priorities for the national inquiry and tackling grooming gangs following the Casey audit
Delegates had an early opportunity to discuss priorities for the national inquiry and its remit, including its role in informing future legislation and policy direction. Key areas for discussion included implications of statutory requirements for defendants, witnesses and local authorities to take part, and how the inquiry can address historic failures in investigations.

Attendees examined recommendations of Baroness Casey’s National Audit on Group-based Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse, and how its findings and the Government’s response can inform policy and practice going forward. Areas for discussion included the rollout of the national police operation to tackle grooming gangs - to be led by the National Crime Agency - as well as identifying areas where investigations should be instigated, the role of taxi licensing in tackling child exploitation networks, and the impact of proposed changes where convicted criminals claiming asylum will now be rejected refugee status.

Joint working, victim support and accountability
Delegates discussed the way forward for strengthening multi-agency safeguarding partnerships, including improving data use, inquiry procedures, and performance oversight.

Areas for discussion included how partnerships can respond more effectively to complex cases of abuse and neglect, and better align with public expectations around accountability, looking at best practice in survivor engagement and proposals aimed at depoliticising processes. The agenda looked at practical implications of establishing the Victims and Survivors Panel and the new Child Protection Authority, alongside measures such as closed case appeals, mandatory reporting, and improving survivor redress where convictions are not secured.

Oversight, standards and the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill
Delegates considered next steps for implementing recommendations from the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse chaired by Professor Alexis Jay, particularly regarding national oversight and mandatory reporting. Sessions assessed how consistent safeguarding standards might best be supported by the work of the proposed Child Protection Authority, and how those reforms are reflected in provisions within the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill. Areas for discussion included the Bill’s proposals for a unique child identifier and a register of children not in school, and what is required to be put in place for effective delivery, including workforce readiness, training, and resources for multi-agency teams.

Online child protection and platform responsibility
Attendees assessed challenges for safeguarding children online, in light of the Online Safety Act 2023 and Ofcom’s implementation guidance. Discussion focused on roles and responsibilities of technology companies, the effectiveness of prevention initiatives, and scope for platforms to mitigate harms and remove harmful content.

Wider issues included the practicalities of embedding a legal duty of care, how guidance can support implementation, and how to balance children’s safety, privacy, and digital access alongside the role of schools and families in managing digital risks.

Contextual harms, risk factors and enforcement
We expected delegates to explore the increasing complexity of risk factors, with a focus on harms beyond the home, such as exploitation through peer networks, gangs, and county lines.

There was discussion on strategies for identifying children at risk, and how to strengthen support through early help, education, policing, and social care. Implications of the Crime and Policing Bill and implementing practical and coordinated enforcement responses were also considered, alongside discussion of pressures on safeguarding services linked to workforce capacity, housing instability, and mental health. Delegates discussed the role of digital tools in supporting investigations, preventing re-victimisation, and improving responses to organised exploitation.

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices, and more widely. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those who attended include officials from DfE; DHSC; Ofcom; Ofsted; ICO; NCA; Education Scotland; DCEDIY, RO; and The Scottish Government.

This conference explored next steps for leasehold and commonhold reform in England and Wales, focusing on priorities for the forthcoming draft Leasehold and Commonhold Reform Bill expected later this year, the transition to commonhold as the default tenure for new flats, and implications of recent regulatory and legal developments.

It brought key stakeholders and policymakers together to discuss implementation of the Government’s proposals as set out in the Commonhold White Paper, and to examine the wider policy framework following the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024.

Implementation priorities and the evolving legal landscape
Attendees considered implications of ongoing consultations on key aspects of leasehold reform. Areas for discussion included proposed changes to enfranchisement costs, including the removal of marriage value and the standardisation of valuation methods. We expected discussion on concerns raised by stakeholders regarding building insurance, particularly around a lack of transparency and disproportionately high premiums for leaseholders. Ground rent regulation was also considered, especially in relation to protections for existing leaseholders and whether any future cap or abolition would apply retrospectively.

Improving transparency and managing transition to commonhold
Further discussion was expected on wider options for delivering a more transparent and equitable approach to leaseholder costs and property management. Practical steps for enabling the adoption of commonhold in new and existing buildings were discussed, alongside the future design of reserve fund requirements, and the treatment of mixed-use buildings. There was also a focus on managing lender confidence, considering implications for mortgage availability and how the legal framework might evolve to support financing in a reformed tenure system.

Balancing interests and shaping regulatory infrastructure
Delegates examined what will be needed to ensure a functioning legal and regulatory infrastructure, as well as balancing the interests of leaseholders, freeholders, developers, and managing agents - particularly in light of planned secondary legislation and ongoing legal challenges.

Strategic direction and long-term implications for housing markets
We also expected discussion on longer-term strategic issues, including options for simplifying conversion pathways from leasehold to commonhold, supporting consumer and professional awareness of the commonhold model, and addressing the affordability and marketability of properties affected by high service charges. Additional areas of focus included the potential emergence of a two-tier housing market, the viability of self-management in commonhold associations, and the broader societal and market impact of a shift away from leasehold tenure.

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices, and more widely. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those who attended include parliamentary pass-holders from both Houses of Parliament and officials from MHCLG; DESNZ; GLD; HoC Library; and the Welsh Government.

This conference examined the way forward for improving the operation and efficiency of the courts system in England and Wales - with a focus on addressing the growing backlog of Crown Court and County Court cases.

Stakeholders and policymakers evaluated immediate and long-term strategies for streamlining court processes and improving case management, alongside wider opportunities for reform that aligns with the broader objectives of fairness and access to justice for victims and consumers.

Policy and recent developments
The conference was an opportunity to examine the direction of government policy, and what will be needed for it to be effective in tackling key issues. It follows the recent announcement of further funding for court repairs, alongside increasing sitting days to 110,000 days’ worth of cases in the next financial year.

Strategic options for tackling delays
Delegates also discussed potential reform being examined in the ongoing Independent Review of the Criminal Courts, which is considering how to address court backlogs more widely.

With significant issues affecting criminal and civil court operations, approaches to mitigating impact on victims, consumers, defendants, witnesses, and legal professionals were examined, particularly in cases such as rape trials where time to resolution is a critical factor. We expected discussion to draw on findings in the NAO’s 2024 report on Reducing the backlog in the Crown Court, looking at how delays have impacted justice outcomes and operational efficiency.

We expected those attending to draw on latest civil justice statistics published by the MoJ in March 2025, which highlighted an increase in claims, alongside key findings from the MoJ’s recently published Review of Civil Legal Aid report. Discussion considered strategies to reduce the time taken from claim to hearing, examining disproportionate barriers to access to justice for the vulnerable, particularly those who have experienced traumatic events or those with mental health problems.

Proposals for further expansion of magistrate sentencing powers, reclassifying offences, and reallocating mid-level cases from Crown Courts to a new intermediate judicial level were also considered. Areas for discussion included implications for resource distribution, appeals processes and the increase of judicial reviews for civil court claims. Further sessions discussed opportunities and challenges in increasing the use of alternate dispute resolution, with the aim of alleviating pressures on court proceedings.

The agenda also looked at measures relating to prison capacity and remand periods aimed at addressing wider impact of operational pressures on court systems, and the effectiveness of contingency mechanisms like Operation Early Dawn in managing prison capacity in the short-term.

Workforce
Further issues contributing to trial cancellations and extended waiting times were discussed. Delegates assessed strategies for addressing staffing shortages among duty solicitors, police officers, and custody staff as well as recruitment and retention of advocates, and the way forward for remuneration and working conditions.

Legal aid
Those attending evaluated ongoing issues related to legal aid and how barriers to sustainable provision in civil cases can be tackled, particularly for vulnerable groups and those facing housing and immigration challenges. Utilisation of the recent increase in funding and priorities for further resources were considered.

Digitalisation and access
Further sessions assessed digital transformation, including the HMCTS’ Court Reform Programme and further use of technology to improve court operations. We expected discussion on the rollout of the new Video Hearings Service, adoption of pre-recorded victim statements, options for reform of interpreting services in court, online dispute resolution, and what can be learned from international best practice in court digitisation and wider modernisation, including the use of AI.

Discussion considered how technological advancements can enhance access to justice, and also how concerns relating to public attitudes, access to technology, bias and quality of service can be managed.

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices, and more widely. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those who attended include officials from MOJ; CPS; HMCTS; DSIT; DBT; DfT; GLD; HMRC; HoC Library; Ofcom; UKVI; and the Welsh Government.

This conference examined the way forward for professional ethics in the legal sector, including the role of regulation and workplace culture, and the impact of AI.

It was an opportunity for key stakeholders and policymakers to discuss recent regulatory proposals, including the recently published consultation paper by the Legal Services Board on policies related to the ethical responsibilities of in-house counsel, litigation conduct, non-disclosure agreements and strategic lawsuits against public participation.

Attendees considered challenges for ensuring ethical use of AI in legal practice, discussing strategies for regulators to set standards for all legal professionals and implications of proposals in the LSB’s consultation which aim to balance innovation, alongside continued education and training for all professional ethical duties. We expected discussion on issues emerging from the Law Society’s continued work on ethical aspects of AI, considering how to address concerns such as bias, maintaining client confidentiality, and transparency in AI-driven decisions - and looking ahead to further guidance from the Law Society and the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

Further sessions discussed latest thinking and best practice in the development of ethical culture within legal practices, including responding to the challenges of sustaining standards amidst rapid technological advancements in light of SRA’s Professional Obligations Thematic review, which highlighted a lack of regulatory knowledge in many law firms. Priorities for implementing legal ethics education and cross-sector collaboration were discussed, particularly the involvement of wider business-focused regulatory frameworks, as well as practical measures for legal professionals to prioritise valid legal claims.

Delegates looked at the Bar Council’s recent research on bullying, harassment and discrimination at the Bar, and the role of workplace culture in upholding ethical standards and priorities moving forward, as well as how these developments impact public trust. Areas for discussion included implications of the SRA’s updated rules regarding transparency in misconduct reporting, and Fieldfisher’s Bar Standards Board Enforcement Review published in April, as well as the work of the Bar Tribunal and Adjudication Service in holding barristers to account for professional misconduct.

Attendees also considered broader challenges, including diversity and inclusion in the legal profession, the independence of legal practice in politically sensitive cases, and the role of lawyers in corporate governance, identifying ESG issues and tackling sham litigation.

Overall, areas for discussion included:

• upcoming regulatory consultations: implications of the LSB’s proposals - ethical responsibilities of in-house counsel - strategies for addressing NDAs and SLAPPs
• ethical use of AI: balancing innovation with ethical standards - ensuring transparency in AI-driven decisions - protecting client confidentiality and maintaining public trust
• AI regulation in legal practice: anticipated guidance from the Law Society and SRA - fostering responsible AI adoption - preventing misuse and bias in AI tools
• developing ethical culture: sustaining ethics amidst technological change - importance of legal ethics education - cross-sector collaboration with regulators such as the FCA
• transparency and misconduct reporting: impact of SRA’s new rules - enhancing public trust - improving communication in disciplinary actions
• disciplinary procedures review: outcomes of the BSB Enforcement Review - streamlining complaint handling - increasing consistency and efficiency
• diversity and inclusion: promoting equality in the legal profession - addressing barriers at senior levels - strategies for active inclusion
• independence of legal practice: safeguarding against external pressures - navigating politically sensitive cases - maintaining professional independence
• mental health and wellbeing: potential SRA policies - implementing support structures in firms - aligning with wider wellbeing initiatives
• lawyers in corporate governance: role in advising on ethics - increasing scrutiny by the FCA - ensuring adherence to ethical standards

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices, and more widely. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those who attended include parliamentary pass-holders from the House of Lords and officials from GLD; MOJ; Defra; DBT; DfT; DSIT; HMRC; HM Treasury; Home Office; NCA; Ofcom; the Welsh Government; and The Scottish Government.

This conference discussed the future for tackling retail crime and anti-social behaviour on high streets in England and Wales, looking at the Government’s Take back our streets mission and priorities for the Crime and Policing Bill.

Key stakeholders and policymakers examined proposals for addressing the long-term growth in retail crime against the backdrop of a sharp rise in assaults on retail staff, particularly in supermarkets, highlighted in the Office for National Statistics’ 2023 Commercial Victimisation Survey.

Delegates assessed latest thinking on the design, scope and practicalities of measures in the Crime and Policing Bill, announced in the King’s Speech and outlined by the Minister for Policing, Fire and Crime Prevention in November. These include making the assault of a shop worker a standalone offence, scrapping the unofficial convention that thefts under £200 be treated as summary-only offences, and boosting neighbourhood policing by reintroducing Police Community Support Officers in local communities and providing 13,000 additional officers.

Sessions in the agenda considered options going forward in light of the House of Lords Justice and Home Affairs Committee’s recently concluded Tackling Shoplifting inquiry and letter to the Minister, which recommended funding rehabilitation initiatives and developing improved systems to report retail crime.

Areas for discussion included increased police presence and legal protection for shop workers, additional support for victims, and improved measurement of crimes, as well as reforms announced in November aiming to improve standards in neighbourhood policing and increase efficiency. Use of technology was also discussed, looking at effectiveness as well as best practice, with privacy concerns arising from use of technology such as body-worn cameras for retail staff, and AI and facial recognition systems to identify repeat offenders.

The agenda also looked at the progress on and next steps for partnerships between businesses and the police, including the Pegasus initiative, which aims to build intelligence about the relationship between shoplifting and organised crime gangs, and the National Business Crime Centre’s (NBCC) standardised witness statement to help retailers submit CCTV evidence.

We are pleased to  have been able to include keynote sessions with: Dame Diana Johnson MP, Minister of State, Policing, Fire and Crime Prevention, Home Office; Lord Foster of Bath, Chair, Justice and Home Affairs Committee; as well as with Chief Constable Amanda Blakeman, NPCC Lead, Volume Crime, North Wales Police; Sophie Jordan, CEO, National Association of Business Crime Partnerships; and Prof Emmeline Taylor, Professor, Criminology, City St George’s, University of London.

Further sessions examined wider expected measures aimed at tackling anti-social behaviour, including Respect Orders for tackling persistent adult offenders on high streets, and for fast-tracking Public Spaces Protection Orders. Further areas for discussion included options for clamping down on dangerous and anti-social use of off-road bikes, and strategies for ensuring local partners co-operate to tackle anti-social behaviour, including the powers that local anti-social behaviour leads would require to be effective.

We also expected discussion on longer term priorities for addressing societal factors such as drug and alcohol addiction and poverty, alongside options for deterrents and penalties, and their impacts on both offenders and victims, as well as possible challenges thrown up by urgent measures introduced to ease prison overcapacity.

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices, and more widely. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those that attended include officials from MHCLG; DBT; NAO; Defra; Home Office; and the Welsh Government.

The conference focused on next steps for equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) in the legal profession.

Discussion brought out latest thinking on the way forward for improving representation of those with protected characteristics, assessing the current shape of diversity in the legal profession, and what can be learned for the future from notable initiatives, best practice and those with lived experience. Stakeholders and policymakers discussed retention and progression to increase the visible diversity in senior legal roles, looking at effective, evidence-based EDI practices to foster genuine inclusion.

It was an opportunity to discuss the direction of government policy, including measures in the draft Equality (Race and Disability) Bill and the Employment Rights Bill, and potential implications for the legal profession, including challenges and practicalities of the extension of pay gap reporting.

The conference also took place in the context of the publication of the new Judicial Appointments Commission: Strategy 2024 to 2027, alongside the Bar Standards Board consulting on revised proposals to promote EDI at the bar, including the potential introduction of a diversity and inclusion duty for barristers, with concerns that proposals are impractical.

Further discussion was expected on priorities for regulatory change and the role of legal regulators in enabling a more diverse profession that retains and attracts talent from a variety of backgrounds. Approaches to widening participation in legal education were considered, looking at student wellbeing and the way forward for reducing drop-out rates. Areas for discussion also included next steps for the Solicitor Qualifying Exam (SQE) and exploring alternative professional entry routes, as well as priorities for ensuring diversity within the judiciary.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Sara Carnegie, Director, Legal Projects, IBA; Lord Justice Mark Warby, Senior Judicial Commissioner and Vice Chairman, Judicial Appointments Commission; Mark Neale, Director General, BSB; Craig Westwood, Chief Executive, LSB; Aileen Armstrong, Executive Director, Strategy, Innovation and External Affairs, SRA; and Naeema Choudry, Partner, Eversheds Sutherland.

Overall, areas for discussion included:

• policy: assessing the Government’s Draft Equality (Race and Disability) Bill - stakeholder views on reporting mechanisms
• regulation: the role of regulatory bodies in promoting diversity and sector accountability - BSB’s new diversity and inclusion duty - standards and expectations - effectively measuring progress
• implementing EDI policies:
  
  • evidence-based inclusion strategies - collaboration in policy creation - improving workplace culture - the role of leadership in tackling issues - resource allocation in EDI
  • reporting and measuring EDI progress - emerging trends in pay gap reporting and tackling pay disparities - strengthening protections against workplace harassment and discrimination
  • harnessing the benefits of diversity to improve consumer experiences
• legal education:
  
  • the SQE and its effect on incoming lawyers so far - the future role of legal apprenticeships - collaboration with employers to increase training opportunities
  • measuring the impact of legal education diversity initiatives - wellbeing in legal education - reducing drop-out rates - improving outcomes for people from marginalised backgrounds - role of reasonable adjustments
• recruitment and retention within underrepresented communities:
  
  • developing diverse talent pipelines - addressing bias - improving access to CPD and training - embedding mentorship and sponsorship opportunities - flexible working in firms
  • effective leadership and role models - mental health and supporting staff wellbeing - increasing progression opportunities - responsible business practices
• improving judicial diversity: assessing the Judicial Appointments Commission Strategy - key priorities for encouraging diversity in pathways to the judiciary

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices, and more widely. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those that attended include parliamentary pass-holders from the House of Lords and officials from CPS; Defra; GLD; MOJ; HMRC; Ofcom; Home Office; the Welsh Government; and The Scottish Government.

This conference discussed the future for legal technology and innovation in legal services in the UK and the use of artificial intelligence moving forward.

It brought key stakeholders together with regulators and policymakers to assess implications for legal firms and their customers of the growing use of AI and other technological innovations in legal practice.

Delegates examined key regulatory and ethical issues, against the backdrop of implementation of the EU AI Act and the new Government’s plans for regulation affecting companies developing powerful AI models, to be overseen by the new Regulatory Innovation Office, as well as recommendations for raising AI uptake across sectors in DSIT’s upcoming AI Opportunities Action Plan. Delegates also considered the impact of the Data (Use and Access) Bill currently progressing through Parliament, with proposals to introduce changes to data protection law, particularly on the use of AI-generated decision-making.

The agenda included a focus on latest thinking on opportunities for service improvement and increasing productivity, and how they can be realised for legal service providers of all sizes. The discussion took place in light of the Government’s recently published Invest 2035: The UK’s modern industrial strategy, including plans to expand the global market for the UK’s professional services by capitalising on emerging strengths, such as accounting and lawtech.

Sessions discussed practical challenges and regulatory implications of the latest developments in AI in legal tech and services. Areas for discussion included AI-driven contract analysis, predictive legal outcomes, the use of blockchains, and wider application of generative AI and machine learning.

With the EU AI Act now in force, delegates explored implications of its tiered obligations for the UK lawtech industry and how legal services in the UK might be affected, including the shape of future alignment with EU and wider international policy.

They discussed technical and business process integration, including strategies and best practice for workforce professional development and upskilling, as well as addressing concerns regarding potential negative impact on employment and progression. Areas for discussion included addressing tech skills gaps, tackling resistance to change, and considering the role of regulation, education and training providers in ensuring that legal professionals are competent in the use of new technologies.

Further sessions looked at data security priorities, safeguarding client confidentiality and accuracy in AI-driven legal services.

Key considerations for regulators and development of the lawtech market were also examined. Discussion drew on the Legal Services Board’s update on its approach to regulating the use of AI, including proposals for the role of tech in improving access to legal services alongside protection of vulnerable groups, and creating a more open market for innovators and tech providers. We also expected discussion on the role of the newly-launched Regulatory Innovation Office.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote contributions from the LSB’s Director of Regulation and Policy, Richard Orpin; as well as from Christina Blacklaws, Chair, LawtechUK; Harry Borovick, General Counsel, Luminance; and Author, AI and the Law: A Practical Guide to Using Artificial Intelligence Safely; Aileen Armstrong, Executive Director, Strategy, Innovation and External Affairs, SRA; Jenifer Swallow, Strategic Advisor and Director, Jenifer Swallow International; and former CEO, LawtechUK; Gregoire Miot, President, European Legal Technology Association; and Ian Jeffery, CEO, The Law Society.

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices, and more widely. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those that attended include officials from MOJ; GLD; HMCTS; HM Treasury; CPS; NCA; HMRC; DBT; DSIT; Defra; DESNZ; MHCLG; DfT; Ofcom; Home Office; the Welsh Government; and The Scottish Government.

This conference looked at next steps for tackling modern slavery and the future direction for policy under the new Government.

Areas for discussion included priorities for identifying and supporting vulnerable workers, as well as improving multi-agency coordination and overall response to modern slavery.

With statistics published by the Home Office indicating a record high of 16,996 reported cases in 2023 and the Government recently pledging to recruit 200 extra staff to tackle a backlog of modern slavery cases, stakeholders and policymakers assessed the effectiveness of the National Referral Mechanism framework for identifying victims of modern slavery, including the way forward for addressing challenges with victim referral.

Delegates also looked at the role of the Independent Anti-Slavery Commissioner and their recent policy brief on tackling sexual exploitation and supporting female victims of modern slavery, options for future legislation and regulation, and improving data and intelligence sharing, as well as key issues emerging from the recent report published by the House of Lords inquiry into the Modern Slavery Act 2015 which found that the UK is falling behind in its response to modern slavery and its support for victims.

Stakeholders and policymakers discussed the Committee’s recommendations, including to separate reporting channels between immigration and exploitation related to employment, as well as considering the Committee’s concerns surrounding the changes in the rhetoric used by the last Government regarding the relationship between immigration and modern slavery, and its impact on survivor support and the infrastructure established by the Modern Slavery Act 2015.

Sessions in the agenda discussed priorities for improving the engagement and response of commercial organisations and public authorities, as well as how compliance and effective tackling of modern slavery in supply chains can be strengthened, including options for improving supply chain oversight.

With the new EU Directive on corporate sustainability due diligence coming into force in July, mandating companies to identify and address human rights impacts within and outside the EU, delegates and stakeholders considered practicalities and best practice in proactive safeguarding and human rights measures within corporate operations, as well as how new measures will impact UK businesses’ supply chain partners. It also came with the new consultation launched by DHSC on proposals to legally require NHS suppliers to mitigate risks of exploitation in their supply chains.

Further sessions explored the way forward for improving responsiveness in public authorities, frontline agencies, businesses and support services, looking at support for victims of modern slavery, including those who enter the UK illegally.

With increased police reports of modern slavery offences and referrals to the National Referral Mechanism, delegates discussed implementation so far of the Serious and Organised Crime Strategy 2023-2028, alongside the National Crime Agency’s own strategy. Delegates looked at latest thinking on disrupting domestic groups, securing the UK border, maximising international cooperation to cut off supply routes, and plans to increase the number of officers dedicated to tackling serious and organised crime in regional policing.

Further sessions examined the UK’s role in tackling modern slavery on an international level, with discussion on existing treaties and frameworks, and areas for further collaboration with key law enforcement partners and human rights bodies.

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices, and more widely. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those that attended include parliamentary pass-holders from both Houses of Parliament and officials from DWP; MOJ; DHSC; UKHSA; CQC; HMPPS; HMRC; Border Force; FCDO; Home Office; ICIBI; NCA; NAO; DBT; DfE; DfT; Ofcom; The Scottish Government; and the Welsh Government.

This conference examined next steps for UK asylum system policy, with a focus on practical considerations for the implementation of proposed reforms to the asylum system and enhancing border security.

It was a timely opportunity for stakeholders and policymakers to assess measures expected in the Border Security, Asylum, and Immigration Bill. Following the Home Secretary’s announcement of increased immigration enforcement over the next six months and the recent appointment of Martin Hewitt to lead the UK's new Border Security Command, we expected discussion on planned measures around detention capacity, specialist recruitment, enforcement and returns, targeting illegal employment, and international collaboration.

Delegates assessed progress and potential impact of the commitment to increase return flights for those who have had their asylum applications rejected and the reopening of immigration removal centres, as well as potential alternatives to the use of detention programmes. The planned increase in powers for law enforcement officers to investigate organised immigration crime was also considered, including implications for law enforcement agencies and their partners.

Further discussion focused on enhancing multi-agency and cross-sector collaboration, including new approaches and frameworks for the care of asylum seekers, alongside how collaboration can best be incentivised, supported and managed going forward to improve system effectiveness. Best practice in effective coordination between legal advice providers, local authorities, education providers and the voluntary sector was also discussed, looking at addressing housing challenges and supporting young refugees, as well as priorities for security and enforcement cooperation with the EU, and options for establishing safer routes into the UK.

The agenda looked at implementation priorities for the Border Security Command and new approaches to collaborative frameworks within the UK, with the EU and more widely internationally. It was a timely opportunity to discuss priorities for international collaboration following the Prime Minister’s trip to Rome to learn from the Italian Government’s approach to dealing with irregular migration. Delegates also considered strategies for the UK’s devolved nations amid reports that Scotland plans to reintroduce free bus travel for asylum seekers and a recent think tank report on enhancing legal services for migrants in Wales.

Amidst continuing concerns surrounding backlogs in the processing of asylum applications, delegates considered priorities for developing efficiency in case management, training, and what is needed to ensure that the system has capacity to clear backlogs.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Daniel Hobbs, Director General, Migration and Borders, Home Office; Vicky Tennant, Representative to the United Kingdom, UNHCR; Jon Featonby, Chief Policy Analyst, Refugee Council; Dr Annette Idler, Associate Professor, Global Security, Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford; and Susan Fratzke, Senior Policy Analyst, International Programme, Migration Policy Institute.

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those that attended include parliamentary pass-holders from the House of Lords and officials from ICIBI; Home Office; MOJ; FCDO; MHCLG; DHSC; HMRC; LAA; DfC, NI; CQC; DWP; DfE; Defra; DSIT; NAO; ONS; Ofcom; Department for the Economy, NI; DCEDIY, ROI; The Scottish Government; and the Welsh Government.

The conference assessed next steps for policy and legal practice to better support separating families in England and Wales.

It brought together stakeholders and policymakers to examine the current system and assess newly integrated initiatives. The conference was also a timely opportunity for delegates to discuss priorities for policy in the new parliament, including the Government’s pledge to strengthen the rights and protections available to women in co-habiting couples. We are pleased that, subject to policy developments, Neal Barcoe, Deputy Director, Family Justice Policy Unit, Ministry of Justice, had joined us for a keynote session.

Taking place following the Budget announcing a rise of £1.9bn over the next two years for the Ministry of Justice, it was an opportunity to discuss priorities for the funding and its potential to be made available for courts and legal aid.

Delegates assessed progress on the aim of increasing transparency and improving public confidence in the courts, including the Transparency Implementation Group (TIG) Reporting Pilot for Family Courts, sponsored by the Judiciary, which has recently been expanded to 16 more courts across England, including private and public cases before magistrates.

The agenda also included a focus on next steps for the laws governing finances in relation to divorce and the ending of civil partnerships, which is expected to be suggested in the Law Commission’s review and scoping report, due for publication later in the year. The report is looking into financial remedies and next steps for the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973. We are pleased to have been able to include a keynote session with the Law Commission from Professor Nick Hopkins.

Attendees discussed the way forward for safeguarding children from harms suffered during family breakdown, including priorities for improving multi-agency working and third sector involvement during the process.

Sessions in the agenda looked at the way forward for child-centred approaches and proceedings, and addressing challenges for those separating in cases of coercive control and domestic abuse, with the Nuffield Foundation’s Fair Shares? report recommending measures to improve processes, as well as highlighting the effect coercive control and domestic abuse have on the allocation of assets. We are also pleased to have been able to include a keynote session with Lead Author of the Fair Shares? report, Professor Emma Hitchings.

Strategies for supporting victims were also discussed, exploring innovative approaches such as trauma-informed considerations taken by the courts and the role of mediation in defusing conflict. The conference took place following recent updates in family court reform - reflected in the Private Family Law Early Resolution Consultation published by the previous government - which emphasise children’s well-being and aim to improve access to early legal advice and navigation of the courts.

We expected further discussion to look at priorities for modernisation of the family justice system and supporting the courts in mitigating harm for those going through family breakdown, including delivering effective outcomes, in light of Cafcass setting out new practice requirements for its Family Court Advisers and Children’s Guardians when advising courts on child welfare and best interests in domestic abuse cases. Next steps for professional competence were also discussed, in light of the SRA recently reporting a 25% increase in complaints against family lawyers compared to last year.

With discussion on diverting relevant cases away to ease the backlog facing the family justice system, delegates looked at strategies to enable administrative efficiencies and latest thinking on options for addressing backlogs. Areas for discussion included the use of non-court dispute resolution (NCDR), financial dispute resolution (FDR) appointments, arbitration, mediation and collaborative law efforts, in the context of newly increased powers of courts to encourage and enforce such tools in the Family Procedure Rules that took effect earlier this year.

Further sessions considered the balance between judicial discretion and achieving consistent outcomes, in response to concerns regarding variability in decision-making.

We are pleased to have been able to include further keynote sessions with: His Honour Judge Edward Hess, Lead Judge, London Financial Remedies Court; and James Pirrie, Director, Family Law in Partnership.

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those that attended include parliamentary pass-holders from the House of Commons and officials from DfE; HMCTS; MOJ; and NAO.

This conference focused on next steps for leasehold reform in England and Wales.

It came with the Government’s announcement of the draft Leasehold and Commonhold Reform Bill in the King’s Speech, alongside the Housing Minister’s recent announcements, which included:

• a timetable from January for the implementation of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act passed by the previous Government
• a commitment that Government would announce in the second half of next year how it intends to ban new leaseholds following a consultation
• the publication of a Commonhold white paper next year

With the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act coming into law in May, it was a timely opportunity to discuss the way forward for the implementation of policy measures and implications from the upcoming draft Bill.

Following the recent Government announcements it was a timely opportunity to discuss the way forward for the implementation of policy measures and implications from the upcoming draft Bill.

Delegates also discussed the Law Commission’s recommendations which the Government are aiming to enact. They considered priorities relating to leasehold enfranchisement and the Right to Manage, looking at addressing unregulated and unaffordable ground rents, and removing the threat of forfeiture as a means of ensuring compliance with lease agreements.

Stakeholders and policymakers also examined key outstanding issues and priorities, including stakeholder concerns, for implementation of the Act following the passing of the legislation at the end of the last parliament. There was also discussion on implications of proposals in the Renters’ Rights Bill on leasehold reform such as ending Section 21 ‘no-fault’ evictions.

There was a focus on practical challenges in enforcing new provisions, such as the process for lease extensions to 990 years and the ban on new leasehold houses, and ensuring transparency in service charges.

Latest thinking on legal and practical barriers to transitioning from leasehold to commonhold were discussed, looking at the framework for the transition period for phasing out leaseholds, compensation mechanisms for freeholders and the role of local authorities. Delegates looked at options for reform of freehold, including strategies for building upon current legislation.

Taking place following the announcement in the Budget of £1bn investment in the housing sector, aiming to speed up remediation of unsafe housing, improve building safety and support future housebuilding, it was an opportunity to discuss priorities for the sector in the context of wider housing policy.

Further sessions discussed dispute resolution in leasehold law, focusing on preparing for changes and improvements in handling disputes to ensure fair and efficient resolutions.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Judge Siobhan McGrath, President, First Tier Tribunal (Property Chamber), Courts and Tribunals Judiciary; Prof Nicholas Hopkins, Commissioner, Law Commission of England and Wales; Prof Martin Dixon, Director, Cambridge Centre for Property Law, University of Cambridge; and Rob Stevens, Head of Property Risk, Nationwide Building Society.

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices, and more widely. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. As well as key stakeholders, those that attended include parliamentary pass-holders from the House of Commons and officials from MHCLG; Defra; HMRC; HM Land Registry; GLD; DBT; DESNZ; HMRC; DfT; DfE; and the Welsh Government.

This conference brought together policymakers and stakeholders to examine the future for immigration policy in the UK.

It was an early opportunity to consider priorities for policy in the new Parliament, including assessing the new Government’s plans to reduce net migration through reform of the points-based system and the skills system, alongside the introduction of a new Border Security Command, as well as the likely impact of measures in the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill announced in the King’s Speech.

The conference took place following the Home Secretary’s announcement of further measures to enforce immigration rules and increase returns, with latest Home Office statistics indicating a decline in immigration numbers.

The agenda included a focus on potential options for reform, and how the immigration system can best be utilised to support the UK labour market. Delegates considered government plans to address skills shortages by upskilling the domestic workforce to reduce employer demand for overseas workers, with discussion on strengthening the Migration Advisory Committee and the creation of Skills England, and introducing new powers to ban hiring from overseas for employers and agencies that break employment law. Recent statistics show a 26% decrease in health and care visa applications.

Sessions also provided an opportunity for delegates to consider potential impacts of the Government’s immigration policies and priorities for tourism and the wider economy, including the Home Office’s announcement that everyone wishing to travel to the UK, except British and Irish citizens, will need permission in advance through an ETA or eVisa.

Delegates discussed key issues and implementation so far of changes to legal migration rules for family and work visas announced by the previous government in December 2023, with restrictions on dependents coming to the UK and increases in the baseline minimum salary to be sponsored for a Skilled Work Visa. They also explored the recent fall in visa applications and its impact on staff and labour shortages, with early indications showing a 27% fall in visa applications overall.

Potential impacts on key sectors, including health and social care, were discussed as well as how they can be addressed.

Further areas for discussion included priorities for tackling labour exploitation, minimising the risk of deception and ensuring workers are fully informed of the nature of their work.

The conference also followed MAC’s Graduate route: rapid review, looking at who is using the route, their activities during and after the route, and its impact on international student numbers and the UK economy. With MAC reporting no evidence of abuse and recommending the continuation of the route, further sessions in the agenda wexplored the future of international student migration, including employment in the UK job market post-graduation.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Philippa Rouse, Director, Migration and Citizenship, and Senior Responsible Officer, Future Border and Immigration System Programme, Home Office; Professor Brian Bell, Chair, Migration Advisory Committee; and Dr Madeleine Sumption, Director, Migration Observatory.

Overall, areas for discussion included:

• the UK points-based immigration system:
  
  
  
  • the current system: assessing immigration strategy - recent migration trends - priorities for developing immigration policy to meet long and short-term economic objectives
  • impact: how the points-based system has impacted the economy and user experiences of immigration - impact of the recently reported reduction in approved visas for the health and care sector
  • key issues for future policy: options for reform of the points-based system - what is needed for a joined-up approach to immigration linked to skills needs - approaches to effective development and implementation - involvement of the NCA to target organised immigration crime networks
• international student migration:
  
  
  
  • impact on students: how changes to student visas would impact international students in terms of accessibility and experience of HE
  • post-graduation employment: assessing recent trends and the impact of international students on UK labour markets - how the UK can strike a balance with student migration to support the economy
  • policy: the future of the graduate route following the MAC’s review - options for policy in the new parliament
• UK labour market:
  
  
  
  • labour shortages: assessing the role and effectiveness of the shortage occupation list - priorities for alleviating pressures in sectors such as hospitality, agriculture, and health and social care - exploring the decrease in visa applications for the health and social care sector
  • policy options: what is needed for immigration policy to best tackle labour shortages, including short-term and seasonal work options - government plans to address skills shortages through the creation of Skills England
  • tackling labour exploitation: improving identification, inspection and enforcement capacity - incentivising proactive cooperation from high-risk industries and employers - options for further regulation
  • supporting victims: empowering exploited workers to seek support - considering incentives and drivers behind behaviour
  • impact on businesses: considering the complexity of the system and its impact on user experience and accessibility for SMEs - exploring collaborative frameworks between businesses and government

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. Those that attended include parliamentary pass-holders from the House of Lords and officials from FCDO; ICIBI; Home Office; MAC; NAO; the Executive Office, NI; DWP; DBT; MHCLG; ONS; Defra; DAERA, NI; Department for the Economy, NI; DfE; DoH, NI; HMRC; DCEDIY, ROI; DFHERIS, ROI; DPENDR, ROI; The Scottish Government; and the Welsh Government.

This conference brought stakeholders and policymakers together to examine next steps for tackling fraud and financial crime in the UK, including priorities for policy in the new Parliament, particularly in the context of the Government’s pledge to introduce a new expanded fraud strategy. As stakeholders await clarity from the Government on the direction of policy, we expected discussion on key issues and options put forward by interested groups.

It was an opportunity to consider the future for measures in the current Fraud Strategy, legislation such as the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act and APP reimbursement reform from the Payment Systems Regulator, coming into effect in October 2024. We are pleased to have been able to include a keynote session with Head of Policy at the Payment Systems Regulator, Kate Fitzgerald, who updated delegates on the changes planned.

We also expected a focus on recommendations for consumer protection outlined in the FCA review into Anti-fraud controls and complaint handling in firms, as well as the future for reimbursing victims of online fraud and liability under the new Government. Delegates assessed approaches to strengthening business strategies for the detection and prevention of fraud, in light of concerns raised in the FCA’s review over the strength of the systems currently in place, and with the FCA currently conducting a Review of firms' treatment of customers in vulnerable circumstances, due to be published this year.

Sessions in the agenda included discussion on options for improving the effectiveness of the current system for reporting, investigating and prosecuting fraud, and the response of the criminal justice system, including sentencing.

These were discussed in the context of new and emerging types of fraud, looking at challenges in strategic coordination of data collection and intelligence-sharing between the public and private sectors, as well as with international partners, especially in light of the Government’s commitment to a Digital Information and Smart Data Bill, announced in the King’s Speech, which will aim to enhance data-sharing practices.

Further sessions considered the role of banking, technology and telecoms, payment companies, media and other key sectors in countering fraud and supporting customers.

There was discussion on key issues for consumers and banks, including what classes as ‘vulnerability’, along with data collection practices, following concerns raised by industry and in parliament over clauses in the Data Protection and Digital Information Bill which would have allowed government to ask banks for details of benefit claimants.

We are pleased to have been able to include further keynote sessions with: Nick Sharp, Deputy Director, Fraud, National Economic Crime Centre, NCA; Andrea Bowe, Director, Specialist Directorate Supervision, Policy and Competition - Markets, FCA; Oliver Hanmer, Head of Supervision, Compliance and Monitoring, Payment Systems Regulator; Riccardo Tordera Ricchi, Director, Policy and Government Relations, The Payments Association; Dr Jonathan Fisher KC, Barrister, Red Lion Chambers; and Senior Fellow, London School of Economics; and Stephanie Borthwick, Principal Policy Adviser, Which?.

Sessions in the agenda included:

• context: assessing the legal and regulatory landscape for tackling fraud in the UK and its current prevalence
• looking ahead: options for legislation and strategy, and priorities going forward
• regulation: priorities and developing frameworks to better support effective fraud prevention
• public awareness: fraud literacy and supporting vulnerable consumers and victims
• collaboration: strategies for coordinated prevention, reporting, investigation and prosecution
• policy: priorities for tackling fraud moving forward

All delegates were able to contribute to the output of the conference, which will be shared with parliamentary, ministerial, departmental and regulatory offices. This includes the full proceedings and additional articles submitted by delegates. Those that attended include officials from the Cabinet Office; DSIT; GLD; DBT; ICO; IPO; Department for the Economy, NI; DWP; OPSS; CMA; HMRC; HM Treasury; Home Office; FSA; Defra; DfT; MHCLG; Department for Communities, NI; Department of Education, NI; Ofcom; and The Pensions Regulator.

This conference discussed next steps for youth justice in England and Wales.

With youth justice being highlighted as a focus in general election campaigning, the conference was a timely opportunity for delegates to discuss priorities for policy in the new parliament.

Delegates assessed the implementation and effectiveness of the NPCC Child Gravity Matrix Framework published last year, the tool used to assist in decisions for the most appropriate outcome for children, taking into account the offence committed and mitigating circumstances.

Further sessions included discussion on strategies for prevention and diversion away from the youth justice system, including improving attainment and access to education, supporting SEND provision, developing multi-agency coordination, and priorities for safeguarding and supporting vulnerable groups. It came with heightened concerns from some stakeholders on the availability of support facilities such as youth clubs or wider diversion schemes.

The conference followed the publication of the Youth Justice Board’s Strategic Plan 2024-2027 which sets out the Board’s vision for a Child First youth justice system. We expected discussion to bring out latest thinking on approaches for addressing challenges identified in the plan, including changes to society brought about by the pandemic, increased use and misuse of technology, a rise in inequalities, and cost of living pressures, as well as priorities for reducing inequalities, supporting victims of crime, and meeting children’s unmet needs. We also expected discussion on priorities for the YJB, with a planned review by the Cabinet Office of its role.

Further sessions examined the conditions and outcomes of youth custody. Areas for discussion included priorities for the opening of new secure schools, following the joint thematic inspection of work with children subject to remand in youth detention from the HM Inspectorate of Probation, which found that three quarters of young people awaiting sentence are remanded in custody, and the subsequent publication of the Government’s Action Plan.

Keynote speakers who have agreed to take part include: Helen Davies, Head, Thematic and Joint Inspection, HM Inspectorate of Probation; Steve Chalke MBE, Founder, Oasis UK; and Professor Neal Hazel, Professor, Criminology and Criminal Justice, University of Salford. We are re-confirming the availability of speakers in the pre-election period.

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues in the presence of key policy officials who attended from CPS; YJB; DfE; MOJ; GLD; HMPPS; Judicial Office; Home Office; DWP; NAO; Ofsted; and the Welsh Government.

The proceedings of the conference will be circulated more widely, to Parliamentarians, ministerial offices, and government and regulatory officials with an interest in the issues being discussed. All delegates will also receive a video recording of the conference.  

This conference focused on next steps for tackling shoplifting and retail crime in England and Wales.

It was an opportunity to discuss key issues at a time of heightened focus on this area of policy in the run up to the General Election.

It followed the announcement by the Prime Minister of new measures to tackle retail crime, under which assaulting a shop worker will be made a standalone criminal offence, and perpetrators could be sent to prison for up to six months and receive unlimited fines. Delegates also discussed legislative proposals to make repeat offenders wear tags and increase the use of facial recognition technology.

Delegates examined policy options and the launch of the NPCC’s new Retail Crime Action Plan, committing to urgently attending scenes of violent shoplifting, alongside the Pegasus initiative, a business-police partnership, which aims to improve intelligence sharing to better identify offenders.

Looking at implementation plans for the strategy, discussion considered implications for a range of stakeholders, including proposals for increasing police presence at the scene, hotspot patrolling in high-crime areas, and development and implementation of problem-solving plans using the SARA model for high-risk areas.

Delegates assessed whether plans go far enough, looking at adequately protecting and training retail staff, and concern over possible displacement of retail crime.

Discussion considered priorities for effective cross-sector collaboration through data sharing and the formation of the new OPAL national team, as well as best practice for retailers in providing best possible evidence for police to pursue cases.

The conference was also an opportunity to explore the suitability of using AI technologies such as facial recognition to identify repeat offenders amidst concerns over biases in the use of such technologies.

In light of proposals to move away from short-term prison sentences, delegates also discussed how this may affect rates of retail crime in the future, the impact on retail workers, and priorities for effective deterrent strategies moving forward.

Keynote speakers who have agreed to take part include: Katy Bourne OBE, Police and Crime Commissioner, Sussex; James Lowman, Chief Executive, Association of Convenience Stores; and Professor Emmeline Taylor, Professor of Criminology, School of Policy and Global Affairs, City, University of London.

Overall, areas for discussion included:

• current retail crime landscape: addressing key issues for small retailers - priorities moving forward in light of offending figures rising
• Retail Crime Action Plan: assessing the scope - parameters of the Pegasus partnership - impact on stakeholders, including retailers, local authorities, police and society more broadly
• implementation: increased hotspot policing - training priorities - protecting staff - cross-sector collaboration models - data sharing - funding and resources
• sanctions: exploring current regulation - how the justice system can respond effectively to retail crime - priorities for reducing reoffending moving forward - addressing possible societal factors
• alternative approaches: assessing positions of opposition parties and their strategies for tackling shoplifting and retail crime
• innovation: the future of self-service check outs and priorities for managing retail crime with their increased use - implementing CCTV, facial recognition and new technology, including AI
• surveillance: addressing concerns around biases, disproportionality, and increased powers for government and police - considering the use of facial recognition to tackle repeat offenders
• policy: priorities for tackling retail crime and shoplifting moving forward

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues in the presence of key policy officials who attended from DBT; DLUHC; the Home Office; ICO; MOJ; NAO; Probation Service; and the Welsh Government.

This conference discussed digitisation and the use of AI technology in the criminal justice system.

It was an opportunity for stakeholders and policymakers to assess how AI deployment across the system may impact the roles of the police, civil servants and legal professionals, employment and skills development, the day-to-day running of services, and criminal justice outcomes.

We expected discussion to reflect key issues emerging from:

• plans for service improvement outlined in the Ministry of Justice’s Digital Strategy
• the House of Lords’ AI technology and the justice system report, which cited both potential benefits to legal productivity and decision-making as well as risks to civil liberties, and called for the establishment of minimum standards and training
• the principles of safety, fairness, transparency and accountability put forward in the Government’s A pro-innovation approach to AI regulation white paper

Discussion considered the role of AI technologies in supporting policing and court services, including opportunities to increase both access to justice and efficiency of decision-making throughout the justice system, and strategies for effective and fair utilisation.

Delegates assessed how key challenges could be addressed, including determining where the human-machine interfaces lie in different contexts, concerns over algorithmic biases and differences in human judgement, and protecting human rights and civil liberties.

Further sessions examined the use of AI more widely in government and public services in areas related to the criminal justice system, including how effectively government is maximising opportunities and mitigating risks - which is the subject of an NAO study.

Delegates also looked at international comparisons of AI integration, as the EU moves to create the first comprehensive regulatory framework for AI as part of its digital strategy.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Mike Freer MP, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Courts and Legal Services, Ministry of Justice; Megan Lee Devlin, Director General for Service Delivery Transformation, Ministry of Justice; Ruth Kelly, Chief Analyst, National Audit Office; Phil Bowen, Director, Centre for Justice Innovation; and Professor Penney Lewis, Commissioner for Criminal Law, Law Commission.

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from CMA; CPS; HMCTS; HMPPS; MOJ; NCA; DWP; HSE; DBT; DLUHC; DfT; DSIT; Dstl; DVSA; Education Scotland; GLD; HMRC; Home Office; ICO; NAO; Ofcom; The Scottish Government; and the Welsh Government.

This conference looked at next steps for leasehold reform in England and Wales, with the Leasehold and Freehold Bill progressing through Parliament.

It was an opportunity for stakeholders and policymakers to discuss key measures in the Bill, including the extension of standard leases from 90 to 990 years.

Delegates looked at options for addressing stakeholder concerns around the affordability of leaseholds, maintenance of property and uncertainty around implementation, especially in the lead up to a general election, with further discussion on the ripple effects on the broader residential market.

They also looked ahead to priorities for the Government’s next stage of reform aiming to abolish new leaseholds for new houses, as well as addressing current exceptions to the ban, including the decision not to ban new leaseholds for flats, exemptions for retirement housing, and land that has already been leased.

Further sessions examined issues going forward, including redress in property disputes, the implementation of ground rent reforms, and the impact on markets, landlords and developers.

Discussion considered alternatives to leasehold, including the future place of commonhold, with a focus on the suitability of the model for the English and Welsh markets, how the model could be made more attractive for lenders, developers and investors, and making the process more efficient and less costly.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Judge Siobhan McGrath, President, First Tier Tribunal (Property Chamber), Courts and Tribunals Judiciary; Professor Nicholas Hopkins, Commissioner, Law Commission of England and Wales; and Professor Martin Dixon, Professor of the Law of Real Property, University of Cambridge.

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from DLUHC; DWP; Law Commission; GLD; DBT; HM Land Registry; Homes England; Defra; HMRC; and the Welsh Government.

This conference examined priorities for optimising mediation and arbitration in England and Wales.

It was an opportunity for stakeholders and policymakers to assess the impact of the Government’s plans to integrate mandatory mediation into all small claims in the civil justice system, as well as measures outlined in the Arbitration Bill, announced in the Kings Speech.

Delegates considered the current state of the market and next steps for integrated mediation, looking at implications of increased use, innovative approaches and collaborative solutions to navigating disputes, and building understanding.

There was also a focus on priorities for workforce development and building capacity across all types of dispute, looking at options for greater oversight on standards, quality and training in the sector, as well as the way forward for encouraging greater diversity in arbitrator selection.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Lord Neuberger, Arbitrator, One Essex Court; and former President, Supreme Court (2012-2017); Kim Wager, Head of Dispute Resolution Policy, Ministry of Justice; Rebecca Clark, Chair, Civil Mediation Council; and Jonathan Wood, President, the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators; and Chair, International Arbitration, Reynolds Porter Chamberlain.

Overall, areas for discussion included:

• Government’s strategy: impact of increased integration of mandatory mediation into all small claims in the civil justice system - improving service delivery as the number of mediation users grow - greater emphasis on avoidance strategies
• Arbitration Bill: assessing the future of domestic and international arbitration under the new Bill - exploring the effectiveness of measures in Bill - the way forward for modernisation 
• workforce: impact of increased use of mediation on the legal profession - priorities for training and professional development - establishing clear standards - addressing concerns regarding lack of diversity
• system efficiency: assessing capacity to deal with increasing reliance on mediation - enabling and promoting effective management of the civil justice system as a whole - identifying areas for improvement
• role of the courts: imposing sanctions and enforcing effective mandatory mediation - considering recent cases which clarify the ability of courts to compel parties to engage in mediation
• service users: building public understanding and confidence in mediation - improving communication, access, support and safeguarding for users - integration priorities for those using mediation, particularly litigants in person - cost management
• technology: the role of tech in enhancing the effectiveness and accessibility of mediation and arbitration processes - upskilling the workforce to deal with increased integration of technology

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from CJC; GLD; HMCTS; Law Commission; Home Office; MOJ; NAO; and the Welsh Government.

This conference examined next steps for legal professional ethics and integrity in the UK.

It brought stakeholders and policymakers together to examine latest developments and challenges, including the way forward for regulation and policy, the roles and responsibilities of regulatory bodies and the legal profession itself, and how legal education may need to respond in helping embed ethical training in preparing lawyers to enter the profession.

The discussion took place amidst heightened focus on the Post Office Horizon IT inquiry, alongside further regulatory focus on these issues following the SRA’s review into the usage of NDAs by law firms, and the Legal Service Board’s Reshaping legal services: a sector-wide strategy.

We are pleased to have been able to include keynote sessions with: Matthew Hill, Chief Executive, Legal Services Board; Sara Carnegie, Director of Legal Projects, International Bar Association; Professor Richard Moorhead, Professor of Law and Professional Ethics, University of Exeter; Professor Andrew Boon, School of Law, City, University of London; and Juliet Oliver, Deputy Chief Executive, General Counsel and Executive Director, Investigations and Enforcement, Solicitors Regulation Authority.

Overall, areas for discussion included:

• current approaches to ethical practice: effectiveness of ethical codes, and options for development - instilling trust and appropriate transparency - assessing the new regulatory position of SLAPPs
• priorities for legal practices in maintaining ethical standards:
  
  • lessons to be learned from the Post Office Horizon IT inquiry
  • assessing the parameters of the modern lawyer’s role and identifying ethical considerations for legal practitioners in providing services to clients
  • discussing how challenges for ethical practice can be addressed, including support for staff, culture and training in firms, and governance and monitoring structures
  • best practice and case studies in managing professional tensions between serving what could be seen as greater public good and the use of tools such as NDAs
• key issues for regulation:
  
  • improving awareness of SRA principles regarding the use of NDAs
  • examining the positions of the Bar Council and LSB on the future direction and scope of regulation
  • how can communication, training, monitoring and compliance be improved
• education, training and best practice:
  
  • integrating legal ethics into education
  • the effect of new legal training structures on legal practice
  • approaches to self-regulatory strategies and culture change - the role of those in leadership positions in legal practices
  • lessons from approaches in other sectors and jurisdictions to ethical education, governance and compliance

The conference was an opportunity for stakeholders to consider the issues alongside key policy officials who attended from the DWP; GLD; HMCTS; Home Office; Judicial Office; MOJ; and Ofcom.